User talk:Taivo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Licence check

[edit]

File:Nomination of Bhagwan Singh Kushwaha (1) 01.jpg, File:Nomination of Bhagwan Singh Kushwaha (1) 03.jpg, File:Nomination of Bhagwan Singh Kushwaha (1) 02.jpg can you mark these as checked. It is from same government of Bihar website. Admantine123 (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kedargupta (1) (1).jpg. too.Admantine123 (talk) 13:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Licencia chequeada

[edit]

@Taivo:Buenas,por favor chequeada la imagen (File:1994. Febrero, 7. Rafael Caldera en su segunda presidencia.jpg)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 23:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: Buenas, por favor chequea la licencia (File:Circulating cells’ contribution to exercise-induced angiogenesis.jpg) AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: Buenas, por favor chequea la imagen (File:Bandera Municipio Rojas Estado Barinas.png) AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Malttew9983

[edit]

Hi Taivo, a few months ago you were attending to the multi-account case, now insists on creating new accounts and continuing to upload images with copyright problems (politicians and political flags of Panama). I have detected the next accounts:

The pattern of uploads and user names is the same. Will it be possible to take measures? Thank you. Taichi (talk) 03:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. All blocked and tagged and their contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

E-post

[edit]

Saatsin Sulle e-kirja Estopedist1 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Vastasin juba ammu kasutajalehel. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stephen Elliott.png

[edit]

Hello Taivo, could you check this image please?, this is a screenshot from the TV series en:Columbo which is still copyrighted. Farsaslord (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stephen Elliott.png. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of revisions

[edit]

Hi Taivo, do you think you can delete Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer Official Portrait (cropped).jpg and then restore the first version uploaded? I was trying to see if {{Cc-non-compliant}} prevented the file from being overwritten, which it didn't. Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 18:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tarjeton Electoral de Venezuela 2024.jpg

[edit]

@Taivo:Buenas,esta foto debería ser removido (deleted) o quedarse (keep)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 20:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing hidden categories

[edit]

Hi, can I ask you why you're removing "Category:Images of New Zealand by User:Podzemnik" from my images? I really wish to keep it there. Please note that the category is hidden. Regards, Podzemnik (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Podzemnik: I thought about COM:overcategorization. I'll try to remember not to remove overcategorization from your files. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Taivo. Please note that it’s not just my photos; many other users categorise their photos by their own rules, and to my knowledge, it hasn’t been an issue so far. A couple of examples: File:Dülmen, Wildpark, Brücke am Herzteich -- 2022 -- 4642.jpg or File:Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 20-24 PAN.jpg (an all the other photos of the uploaders). Regards, Podzemnik (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/All files at Category:Minutes of the Vote Count for the 2024 Presidential Elections in Venezuela

[edit]

@Taivo:Buenas, estas fotografías deberían de ser removido o quedarse?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 06:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DRs' categories

[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that you opened DRs as this one, without adding the proper category, that is Category:Italian FOP cases/pending. Please, pay more attention the next time, thank you. Friniate (talk) 10:11, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eurofighter Typhoon braking parachutes

[edit]

Not an "Unused and implausible redirect (G2): author's request on creation day"

This was an undiscussed category rename, contrary to all our other similar categories. A category that had been created by someone else, a year and a half ago. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Militum professio scriniarii nominated for speedy deletion the redirect which he created on the day of nomination. The user seemed to me trustworthy. Taivo (talk) 20:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would you consider this a mistake, or would you still do the same thing again? I don't know if this is against policy or not, but it ought to be. This is far from the interpretation of G2 that's the intention of it! Andy Dingley (talk) 21:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not consider this a mistake and I would do that again. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Illegitimate Barrister

[edit]

I've started a discussion at COM:AN/U, but after speedily deleting the SVG files, they have turned around and simply uploaded PNG versions. They took them to deletion quickly after I tried submitting them as a clear copyvio, they are at File:Flag of Spokane Valley, Washington.png and File:Logo of Spokane Valley, Washington.png. —Locke Cole • t • c 04:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

Hello Taivo, Is this image in the public domain?

Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. No. I nominated it for deletion. Sorry, I was in summer vacation. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User 203.37.238.116

[edit]

Hello Taivo, please have a look at his edits. It is vandalism? Buch-t (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Buch-t: Yes. I just blocked and mass rollbacked all ~280ish edits from that range. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source for deleted image

[edit]

Hi Taivo -- a very long time ago(!) you closed this delete request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1996oakfieldtornado.jpg. Can you please view the deleted page and tell me what the source of the original image was? --Rlandmann (talk) 23:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rlandmann: No other source than "National Weather Service website", so the image has serious {{source}} problem as well. Image itself was quite small, only 442×292 pixels, and it was similar to file:2016-06-13 10-41-51 82.0 Iceland - Hellu Hella.jpg, but darker and there was a big tornado where all straight lines meet. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks! Rlandmann (talk) 05:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Usin kustutaja tegutsemas

[edit]

See võiks vajada sinu tähelepanu. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See kustutamishuviline kasutaja oleks tarvis blokeerida. Tal näib olevat ka muud samalaadset tegevust. Kruusamägi (talk) 09:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ma otsisin ega leidnud pärast Künnapi piltide kustutamiseks esitamist muud vale tegevust. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Vaadates tema kasutajaarutelu ajalugu jäid silma kohad, kus ta kustutas teiste kommentaare (näide), kus on kritiseeritud tema tegevust eri materjali kustutamiseks esitamisel (näide) ning kus on esinenud selgeid probleeme tema kategoriseerimistegevustega (näide). Samuti jäigi silma ainult kriitika ja küsimused tema tegevuse osas ehk näib ilmne, et ta tegevus olnud üsna vastuoluline. Samas ka lihtsalt kiiruga kerisin seda ajalugu. Aga võttes lihtsalt mingi vanema versiooni arutelust jäi esimese asjana silma see, kus ta on täpselt samamoodi esitanud kustutamiseks kasutuses olevaid pilte ja mõnitanud kasutajat, kes on tema tegevuse probleemsusele tähelepanu juhtinud (hea näide tema kõneviisist: "Sorry, I didn't know you couldn't read multi-sentence paragraphs. My bad. I'll be sure to draw you picture next time. I'd say to see my comment below this for further clarification, but it's probably to many sentences for your reading compression level. Again, sorry, I'll try to stick to simple kindergarten level diagrams next time. Since that seems to be all your capable of reading.") Seda võttis kenasti kokku kommentaar sama teema lõpus: "While the DRs are open you're asking all of the pinged editors to justify why their uploads shouldn't be deleted, when in many cases they simply don't need to do that. We're not into leisurely academic semantics here, five other editors are telling you that you are misapplying a long-standing policy, while you say that it's unclear to you. For the sake of the pinged editors, you should think harder and quicker about that. At the very least, consider retracting the in-use images from your recent nominations and having a single discussion about COM:INUSE somewhere, renominating the files if it still seems appropriate when the policy is clearer to you." Ja kui võtta juurde kommentaarid nagu see, siis tekib küsimus, et kas teda on ka blokeeritud? Ja kui pole, siis miks? Kruusamägi (talk) 14:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See arutelu peab olema avatud nädal aega. See saab täis kolmapäeval. Vaatame, kas ma suudan neljapäeva hommikul esimesena jaole saada ja arutelu sulgeda. Kui jah, siis jätan kõik pildid ilma erandita alles. Selleks, et mul oleks õigus arutelu sulgeda, ei soovi ma selles osaleda. "Siis tekib küsimus, kas teda on ka blokeeritud" – kas sa ei oska kasutaja blokeerimislogi vaadata? Kolm korda on teda blokitud. Ja kui ta oleks pärast Künnapi piltide kustutamiseks esitamist veel mingi lolluse teinud (sinu näited on küll õudsed, aga ajast enne), siis oleksin ta neljandat korda blokkinud. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tegin eestikeelsesse Vikipeediasse ka üleskutse artikleid koostada.
Ma ei ole kindel, et mitteadministraatorina kõigile logidele ligi saan. Aga samas ma pole sellega ka eriti katsetanud. Hetkel suutsin tuvastada ainult ühe blokeerimise 2. juulist. Samas tekitas küsimusi ka see, et silma jäi mitmeid teisi kontosid, kus oli sees "Adamant1" (aga ega omamoodi küsitav on ka selle sõna tähendus ehk "refusing to be persuaded or to change one's mind"). Kruusamägi (talk) 10:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ole hea ja hoia sel kasutajal silma peal. On üsna ilmne, et tema tegevus on probleemne. Ainuüksi tema pidevad solvangud teiste aadressil on piisav põhjus püsivaks blokeerimiseks. Kui ta aga veel mingite Eesti piltide kallale tuleb, siis ei ole mõtet enam armulik olla. Igavene blokeering ja kohe. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pildi kustutamisevajadus

[edit]

Tere. Kas selle pildi ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marian_V%C3%B5sumets_2021._aastal_Arvamusfestivalil.jpg ) kustutamisprotsessi saaks kuidagi kiirendada? --Sillerkiil (talk) 11:50, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Sulgesin taotluse, jätsin pildi alles. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On küll tõsi, et fotol kujutatul pole mingit juriidilist alust pildi likvideerimist nõuda, aga samas on meil ka selgelt parem pilt olemas ehk võime siin soovile vastu tulla ja mitte tüli kiskuda. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jah, Võsumetsast on mitu pilti, nii et kõnealuse pildi kustutamise korral ei jää artikkel või wikidata illustreerimata. Sillerkiil (talk) 07:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a file you reviewed

[edit]

Hello @Taivo, hope you are doing well. This is regarding a file you reviewed. The license mentioned there is CC-BY-4.0 which is ok when we see the source. But when it comes to the author it is mentioned as Government of Bihar. And the permission section has given a link to a GoB website. now their policy states

Extended content
Material featured on this website may be reproduced free of charge. However, the material has to be reproduced accurately and not to be used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Wherever the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledged. However, the permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any material which is identified as being copyright of a third party. Authorization to reproduce such material must be obtained from the department/copyright holder concerned.

There is no mention of CC-BY-4.0 there. PRS publishes their work under this license. But when this work is of GoB then how can this license be used? Please clear this confusion. ShaanSenguptaTalk 04:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing the mistake. Actually the CC license is written in bottom of file source page and the permission field is irrelevant. I should remove the permission line; now I did it. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo my issue is a bit different. Maybe confused will be a better word to describe my problem. When the author is GoB, then how come the file is mentioned as under 4.0 license. Just bcoz PRS has published it, can it be released here under licence of their selection? What I think is it should be released under the licence the original holder has published under. Since the permission says that it should be published accurately. I maybe wrong. Plz clear this. ShaanSenguptaTalk 16:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source site says: "PRS Legislative Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." Here is no mentioning "The license does not apply to items copyrighted by third parties." Instead, everything is CC BY-4.0. Apparently PRS obtained permission to publish the photos from copyright holders. As copyright holder seems to be Bihar government, this is plausible and even sensible. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WLM 2024

[edit]

Lisati selline jaburus. Võib vabalt olla miski aus viga, aga mõistlik oleks see vast pikema jututa likvideerida. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. See on ikka päris mitut pidi autoriõiguste rikkumine. Kustutasin kohe. Taivo (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Portreed raamatusse “Kes on Kes? Eesti 2000”. Ekspresskataloogide AS

[edit]

That was probably the right call in the grander scheme of things. I was actually probably going to retract it myself at some point anyway once the bullying calmed down. I appreciate that you didn't mention me in the closing comment though. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Taivo, please see: User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests. Krd 13:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 16:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Taivo&oldid=919839543"