User talk:George Chernilevsky

I respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.

Archives 2009 (1) | 2009 (2) | 2009 (3) | 2010 (1) | 2010 (2) | 2010 (3) 2010 (4) | 2010 (5) | 2010 (6) | 2011 (1) | 2011 (2) | 2011 (3) 2011 (4) | 2012 (1) | 2012 (2) | 2012 (3) | 2013 (1) | 2014 (1) 2015 (1) | 2015 (2) | 2015 (3) | 2016 (1) | 2016 (2) | 2017 (1) 2017 (2) | 2018 (1) | 2018 (2) | 2019 (1) | 2019 (2) | 2019 (3) 2019 (4) | 2020 (1) | 2020 (2) | 2021 (1) | 2021 (2) | 2022 (1) The War 2022 (1) | The War 2022 (2) | 2022 (2) | 2023 (1)

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!

Hello George Chernilevsky !,

Camera1 mgx

Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fomitopsis pinicola 2023 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Appeasement.jpg

Hello George, in these difficult times, would you find some interest in changing the name of this file, because of #2. Thank you so muche George. Keep safe. Lotje (talk) 04:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Допоможіть, будь ласка, повернути мої фото до сторінок, які будуть видалені

Добрий день! Мені прийшло повідомлення, що частина моїх фото на сторінках Мар'ївка та Радомський буде видалена. Пишуть про "На цей момент на сторінці опису файлу вказано, хто створив похідний твір (світлину), але не вказано автора (авторів) оригінального твору, тому загальний ліцензійний статус файлу є нез’ясований. Якщо ви не є автором оригінального твору, зафіксованому на цьому зображенні (цій світлині), Вам необхідно вказати автора (авторів) та/або правовласника (правовласників)." Ці фото було зроблено в 50ті роки, автори невідомі, скоріш за все, вже давно померли, оригінали знаходяться у мене, я їх відсканувала і виклала у вікіпедію. Тепер яким чином мені їх підвердити, звідки? File:Місцевий клуб.jpg File:Терентієв Микита Андрійович.jpg File:Степанець Євдокія Степанівна.jpg А це фото було зроблене мною в музеї, то я мені його підтвердити? Я просто не розумію яким чином підтверджувати те,шо невідомо хто робив зі старими фото і якщо фото робила я особисто. Допоможіть, будь ласка, розібратись. File:Boichenko2.jpg Cerise303 (talk) 09:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

@Cerise303: , hope you don't mind, but for readability purposes I made the file links. Tha's easier for everybody to follow/understand. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Edible mushrooms in baskets 2022 G1.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edible mushrooms in baskets 2022 G1.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Kuzya-Bestalanniy (Matorin).jpg

Hello George, do you know the tale related to this image ? Thanks :-) Lotje (talk) 04:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi,Lotje
related link is wikisource
The postcard depicts the narrator of the tale (most likely) or Kuzya's father. Not the main character anyway --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Y're a star George, thank you so much. btw, the photo's from your smartphone, will you upload them here with description in English? My thoughts are with you all in Ukraine. Wish I could make this stupid war end. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 14:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quinces in basket 2023 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 06:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quinces in basket 2023 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2024 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2024 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 06:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Very nice photos indeed, George. Thank you and congrats! also from me. Lotje (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quinces in basket 2022 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peaches in basket 2023 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polyporus squamosus 2022 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 13:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samum corvette 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1135 Ladny 2012 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Submarine Zaporizhzhia 2012 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Moskva and Shtil 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1135 Ladny 2012 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Submarine Zaporizhzhia 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetman Sahaidachny 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Submarine Zaporizhzhia 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetman Sahaidachny 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelydra serpentina 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slavutych U510 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hetman Sahaidachny 2012 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower St Nicholas 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church Vin 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church bell 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peonies in a vase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 08:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church Vin 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church Vin 2017 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2022 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Moskva and Ternopil 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church bell 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2022 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Moskva and Turbinist 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbinist minesweeper 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimean rocks 2012 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimean rocks 2012 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimean rocks 2012 G06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimean rocks 2012 G07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality enough, but it would be sharper.--Tournasol7 04:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimean rocks 2012 G08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimean rocks 2012 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and beautiful composition. --ArildV 08:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimean rocks 2012 G04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crimean rocks 2012 G05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivanovets corvette 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ternopil 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Moskva and Ivanovets 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Moskva and Turbinist 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fomitopsis pinicola 2023 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fomitopsis pinicola 2023 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emys orbicularis 2020 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emys orbicularis 2020 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emys orbicularis plastron 2020 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emys orbicularis 2020 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Russula delica (Milk-white brittlegills), picked fungi in basket.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Russian minesweeper Turbinist, left side view in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ukrainian minesweeper Cherkasy, left side view in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ukrainian command ship Slavutych, left side view in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Russian corvette Ivanovets, left side view in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ukrainian corvette Ternopil, left side view in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This image is much more used, has better quality in terms of light and contrast and should be assessed as VI instead. The cope "left side view in 2012" is too narrow. --August (talk) 20:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks for your review. In the scope, the year is important, since there were changes in paint and markings and even a change in the country of\ownership due to capture. The side view, frontal or rear view are also very different. The left and right sides of ships and submarines (include this submarine) are very often not symmetrical. Therefore, i believe the scope is indicated correctly. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
• The other image you selected does not meet all the criteria (not geocoded). The image is very low quality. Also, this is right side (different drainage holes, anchor hatch in the bow). The submarine is gray in the old paint. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The scope is too narrow: Boat → Year → Side view – by using this we could create up to fife VI per year of existence. --August (talk) 08:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Same question, same answer. Please read my answer above carefully.

And point by point:

• Submarine name - mandatory for the scope.
• Side view - desirable, since the view from different angles is very different (see above).

We have thousands of awarded VIs with a scopes indicating angle of view (Top/bottom/side/front/dorsal/ventral, etc.)

Previously, it was possible to create a set of images, but Commons even do not have photos to view from all angles.

• Year - is also important (considering the fate of this submarine). I can replace the year with a phrase like "in service to Ukraine until captured in 2014", but i think it is easier to just indicate the year.

I understand your point about the narrow scope, but in this case it is justified by the history of this submarine and the war. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I see your point. And your suggestion "in service to Ukraine until captured in 2014" might be better than just giving a year. --August (talk) 20:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Please take a look at the article. russian warship.

All illustrations used in this article are year-specific, as is typical when describing ships. Illustrations are used in a similar way in other language wikis in articles about ships.

Perhaps you will accept my point about the scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

• That's a good point.  Thank you. So I suggest Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia in 2012 as scope [[:Category:Zaporizhzhya (submarine, 1970)|Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia in 2012]]. --August (talk) 05:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia, left side view in 2012 to Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia in 2012 {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

@Archaeodontosaurus and Augustgeyler: please look again and vote again -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Support  Thank you. --August (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Black sea water near Fiolent 2009 G1.jpg

Hello George, hope all is well at your end... Noticing this addition, I guess some word is missing? Where can I vote? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 13:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Lotje,  Done. Some info added --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pholiota aurivella 2023 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Edible fungi in basket 2022 G5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edible fungi in basket 2022 G5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yashmovyi beach (Jasper beach), pebbles and water.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support the explanation gives the value of the image...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunflower head 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lepista nuda (Wood blewit, Blue stalk mushroom), picked fungi in basket.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. There are many photos of this species in the category, but not of the mushrooms in a basket.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watermelon yellow 2024 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Moskva and Chernihiv 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chernihiv minesweeper 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40AM tractor 2013 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:24, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2013 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2013 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suzdalets 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ukrainian minesweeper Chernihiv in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ( Question Perhaps specify the view from the port side?) --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review. I don't think there is a need for more detailized scope, as the category is poor, just a few shots of the ship itself. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suzdalets 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)