User talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive 58

FaceMePLS images

Hello Zhuyifei1999

Are you still available?

Currently Category:Flickr images needing human review contains 8111 entries. But 5162 of them are also in Category:Photographs by FaceMePLS. These are files from this flickr account that changed licenses. They were uploaded by 1VeertjeBot, including an archived link where the original license can be checked.

See for instance File:'Herfst Clingendael' (300801199).jpg or File:'Bloemenauto' Lange Voorhout Den Haag (7378789886).jpg.

These could be reviewed manually, but I think we should instead get FlickreviewR_2 able to review these files through their archived versions.

(pinging also 1Veertje and Multichill)

Platonides (talk) 00:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

FaceMePLS images

Hello Zhuyifei1999

Are you still available?

Currently Category:Flickr images needing human review contains 8111 entries. But 5162 of them are also in Category:Photographs by FaceMePLS. These are files from this flickr account that changed licenses. They were uploaded by 1VeertjeBot, including an archived link where the original license can be checked.

See for instance File:'Herfst Clingendael' (300801199).jpg or File:'Bloemenauto' Lange Voorhout Den Haag (7378789886).jpg.

These could be reviewed manually, but I think we should instead get FlickreviewR_2 able to review these files through their archived versions.

(pinging also 1Veertje and Multichill)

Platonides (talk) 00:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

I have moved them to Category:Flickr images by FaceMePLS needing human review so they are at least not flooding the main category. Platonides (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

FAQ

Help, your bot / tool / whatever is down / bugged!

Too bad. Figure it out. There may or may not be someone who will be willing to look into it.

I want some zoomed in version of some zoomable image on the Internet.

Check dezoomify. If it doesn't work ask dezoomify's maintainer.

Can you help me with a translation?

No.

I need help with toolforge.

File a ticket on Phabricator

Please don't delete an image.

See COM:D and COM:OTRS

Can FlickreviewR add an exception for a certain uploader?

No, it doesn't do exceptions.

Can I run SignBot on some other wiki?

Yes. Find a bot operator to fork and run its code

Can you add a Gadget?

Ask COM:AN

Can you tell me how something works?

Probably. Ask someone for my email address and then email me. I may ignore any messages on this page.

File:Malabar Thiyyar Tharawad.jpg

the file(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Malabar_Thiyyar_Tharawad.jpg) you reviewed is in flickr at this URL:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/56228104@N08/51038869982/in/dateposted-public/

please verify — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noncreativephotographer (talk • contribs) 09:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

i follow the breadcrumbs to bot 2.0

A dish of assorted cookies, including sandwich cookies filled with jam for User talk:Zhuyifei1999

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 00:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

• 

my granddad that is passed away was in Italy for the battle... thanks for posting... never did get these photos in the public school history classes — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 01:01, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File: Várzea Grande.jpg

Bom dia, eu hospedei um ficheiro no Commons e o link é do Flickr, gostaria de saber o que pode ser melhorado ou corrigido no File: Várzea Grande.jpg para atender os critérios do Commons. Fico grato com a resposta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruno Luiz (talk • contribs) 16:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

File: Brave On Windows 11.jpg

I have changed the license from "All Rights Reseved" to "Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0)". Kindly recheck and remove the warning.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justauserboy (talk • contribs) 08:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

File:2010 Art on Ice in Zürich - Shae-Lynn Bourne.jpg

Sorry, I thought that for cropped images it's enough to link to the original file uploaded to Commons. I added the link to the image on flickr.com now as well. I hope, it's okay now. Best wishes Henni147 (talk) 13:58, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Backlog

Since some days the bot FlickreviewR 2 seems not able to get to photos with names that start with “I” or any other letter later in the alphabet – because the bot always starts at the beginning of the alphabet and there are too many photos, it never reaches the “I” and later letters. If this state of affairs continues, some photos will never be reviewed. Would it be possible to make the bot process more photos per day? Or is there another solution? Best, --Aristeas (talk) 06:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Right now, all the 5,330 unreviewed files in the queue start with the letter H and beyond. I uploaded a file starting with F a moment ago, it was reviewed almost instantly. There must be an obstacle somewhere, so that only the files starting with numbers or with the letters A to G are reviewed. --Edelseider (talk) 13:24, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Currently, the first unreviewed image in the alphabet is File:Hyosung RT 125.jpg, which has been awaiting review since November 8, so it's getting through almost all the "H" names. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@Adeletron 3030: Do you mean that files with names like "Hamburg.jpg" or "Heseltine.jpeg" are getting through? --Edelseider (talk) 14:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@Edelseider It looks that way. File:Hungary Air Cargo, HA-LHU, Airbus A330-243F.jpg and File:Hartebeest, Masai Mara, Kenya (52496669257).jpg have been reviewed, for example. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for that information. The problem is still not solved, though, and the backlog keeps growing. Could someone please repair the bot? --Edelseider (talk) 06:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Edelseider and Adeletron 3030, for your investiation. Well, the problem is probably, who should repair the bot. Zhuyifei1999 who used to operate the bot has retired (see notice on the user page), so it seems that, as very often with such tools, there is no official maintainer … That’s really terrible, so many useful tools erode and finally disappear because we have not enough maintainers!

And the documentation is poor, too. For example, where is the source code? I would expect to find a link immediately on the information page about the bot, but I can’t even find that …

@Bryan: you used to operate the original FlickreviewR bot. Any chance you could have a look at FlickreviewR 2 and this issue? That would be great! (But it seems that Bryan has more or less retired, too. That’s a pity!)

Has anybody any idea who knows enough about programming the Python interface of Wikimedia etc. to take a look at this issue? --Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

@Aristeas: We seem to be on the right track now, see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#FlickreviewR 2 does only review files with names starting with 0 to 9 and A to H. --Edelseider (talk) 14:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

@Edelseider: Wow, thank you very much! Hope it helps … --Aristeas (talk) 14:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Seems the bot works normally again – hurray! --Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

lol now the bot is running amok again. XD

so, File:Hyosung RT 125.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/mountainash/14120604155/ causes problems. best solution is if someone can dig into the codes and debug. otherwise we just need someone to manually bypass such things every time it occurs. RZuo (talk) 14:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

notifying the bot's active maintainers @Multichill, Stang, Steinsplitter, and WhitePhosphorus: . RZuo (talk) 14:43, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

i just tested again: special:diff/706634772. the bot is probably stuck somewhere beyond our control on commons. RZuo (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

The bot is stuck again. The backlog went from under 100 to over 800 in the last 8 hours. Can't tell what the issue is though. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

was stuck at File:A Red Ribbon Hangs in Front of the White House in Honor of World AIDS Day.jpg. cause unknown. RZuo (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/upload&type=upload&user=Ooligan&offset=2022120706 this user's uploads were causing problems, it seems. RZuo (talk) 15:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

My suspicion is the photographer credits in brackets copied from Flickr descriptions — I fixed some of them and see if that makes a difference. Edit: It did not. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:55, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

user said s/he was using uploadwizard's flickr import: special:permalink/713174152#How_did_you_import_flickr_photos?. RZuo (talk) 16:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

I tagged them with {{Flickrreview}}, but I don't think I've ever had an issue with State Department photos. It looks like the Upload Wizard didn't add a license or the review template? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

looks like State Department photos cannot be processed. now stuck at File:Secretary Blinken and Secretary Austin Co-Host the 2022 Australia-U.S. Ministerial Consultations (52546616237).jpg. RZuo (talk) 16:23, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

See also COM:VP#Flickr2commons.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 16:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

probably two things are broken:

1. compare these two uploads: dec 6 dec 7. supposedly they are the same situation? but dec 7 one's licence was left as "undefined" by uploadwizard.
2. the photos themselves couldnt be processed by the bot, whether they're state department photos or the dec 7 one. i copied the exact same licence part from dec 6 one to dec 7 one: special:diff/713180536. bot is unresponsive.

RZuo (talk) 16:38, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

my hypothesis is something is changed on flickr, causing uploadwizard to fail to identify the licence (us govt works/no known restrictions, something that's not CC), and the bot to also fail to understand the licence. RZuo (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

@RZuo: It should instead shuffle a file off to Category:Flickr images needing human review‎ or Category:Flickr videos needing human review‎ and go on to the next.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 17:17, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

i'm not the code maintainer. i cant see the source codes either.

i have a simple idea to bypass this problem though. instead of strictly following alphabetical order, the bot could randomise the starting point (a random string of 3 chars should be quite good) every 15 minutes. suppose it's stuck at File:A Red Ribbon..., 15 minutes later the starting point is randomised to be "bc9", then it would start reviewing stuff behind this until it finishes the cat or runs into another obstacle. RZuo (talk) 17:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Randomise starting position of review

i imagine, one way to avoid building up a large backlog when the bot is stuck at a particular file, is to randomise "from which string" the bot starts reviewing. this doesnt solve the problem of those unreviewable files, but should minimise disruption and long queue.--RZuo (talk) 17:31, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

@RZuo: It could also log the filenames it is having problems with and why when shuffling off as per my message of 17:17 above, or back off those files exponentially.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 20:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Image was labeled uncompatible with wikimedia commons

Hi there. The upload of the publicly free usable Flickr image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beobachtung_der_direkten_Auswirkungen_einer_chemischen_Reaktion.jpg#metadata) was marked and critizised by FlickreviewR 2. I downloaded this image from flickr and on flickr there was the note that it was licenced under "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)". On the original website of the licences it was mentioned that there would be a new version of this licence available but that the old licence would not bee changed automatically for this photo. So I checked out what would be the new licence and it was "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)". I would love to use the pic to make wikipedia more attractive! Do You think there is a possibility to do so by the circumstances mentioned above? Thanks for Your attention and sorry for the bother. Best wishes. Matthias.vanrhijn (talk) 20:26, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Matthias.vanrhijn: Hi, and welcome. I'm sorry, but licenses with restrictions -nc- (noncommercial) and -nd- (no derivatives) are not usable by themselves for Wikimedia Commons. For the reasons, please see Commons:Licensing/Justifications. If you can't get a compliant license, works with such restrictions may still be uploaded to English Wikipedia in compliance with en:WP:F because we don't allow Fair Use here.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 03:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Okay thank You very much for Your kind and helpful information! Best Wishes. Matthias.vanrhijn (talk) 14:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@Matthias.vanrhijn: You're welcome!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 14:45, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

the File:Ana Toma.jpg should was passed

@Zhuyifei1999 You should pass for this picture because this picture is from Flickr. Must pass verification with this file as the file of File: Ana Toma.jpg Tsnded1 (talk) 09:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Tsnded1: No, you should stop uploading copyright violations.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 00:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Flickr images needing human review

sorry for writing on your page first. i might write this again on vp later.

i found that the bot might sometimes have hiccups and return size not found, e.g. File:12.17 總統接見「美國退伍軍團協會總會長賴斯塔德訪團」 (46350888361).jpg File:Rome 2015 95 2 (20570268974).jpg. i think it'll be a good idea to run the bot thru Category:Flickr images needing human review (for everything, or better only for files that were created with the tags "flickr" or "flickr2commons [1.0]") once a month. or another bot can reinsert {{Flickrreview}} to such files. this can minimise congestion in the human queue. RZuo (talk) 01:23, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @RZuo: The bot has already been through those files.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 01:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 has started, Join us!

Hello Zhuyifei1999/Archive 58,

Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How to Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading ! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Common. Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

• 1st prize: 500 USD
• 2nd prize: 400 USD
• 3rd prize: 300 USD
• Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD Each
• Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 150 USD & 150 USD
• Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 100 USD, Second prize: 50 USD
• Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
• Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)

You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group

Warm regards,

Rockpeterson

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

2 bot edits seem wrong

Your bot's two recent edits on File:Vermont-public-radio-vermont-pbs-logo.webp seem wrong to me. Besides placing the same category twice on this image, I would think {{TOO-US}} is perfectly acceptable in lieu of a license. - Jmabel ! talk Jmabel ! talk 19:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

that's not a licence template. {{Textlogo}} is. RZuo (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Any recent changes to YiFeiBot?

Hope you don't mind the questions, but did you recently make a change to YiFeiBot? I noticed that thousands more files have been added to Category talk:Media missing infobox template and that bot seems to be responsible. Until the last few days the file count has been fairly stable, but recently it's increased by thousands of files. This isn't a complaint, all the new files seem to have been categorised correctly, but they also don't appear to be new files so I'm confused as why they're only being tagged now. Where are they coming from? Had the bot been paused or busy with another task until recently? Scyrme (talk) 20:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

The script responsible for this broke since October 2021, due to a combination of Python 3 upgrade, Pywikibot upgrade, and database schema change. I fixed it along with a few other tasks. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Good to know. Thanks for the info! Scyrme (talk) 16:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

FlickreviewR 2 has apparently broken down.

Hi Zhuyifei1999, FlickreviewR 2 (talk · contribs) isn't reviewing anything at the moment, it seems to have broken down. Could you look into it? Thank you very much, Edelseider (talk) 08:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

In fact, it has slowed down bizarrely. It does review some files from time to time, but the queue is growing longer and longer. --Edelseider (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

@Edelseider it's getting stuck like last time User_talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive_58#Backlog, remember? RZuo (talk) 11:36, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

@RZuo: for exactly the same reason again? I can't believe it. --Edelseider (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

i think the problem last time was patched, but this time it got stuck with File:FNK 2848 (52599945887).jpg probably for something else.

@Multichill, Stang, Steinsplitter, and WhitePhosphorus: can you please consider User_talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive_58#Randomise_starting_position_of_review or other methods of circumventing the "bot gets stuck" problem? RZuo (talk) 11:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

it's pretty weird that it could pass File:FNK 2831 (52600441711).jpg but not File:FNK 2848 (52599945887).jpg: same flickr account, same camera, same licence, uploaded on commons 1 minute apart. RZuo (talk) 11:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Could you please explain the 6 month delay for Flickr review from upload.

@Zhuyifei1999

This file and 6 others were uploaded in April 2022. This file was "reviewed" in October 2022. These flickr photos were not found due to this delay and were added to a Flickr photo not found category.

Is this flickr review delay issue resolved?

Where can I find the current list of flickr photos waiting for Flickr Review 2? -- Ooligan (talk) 01:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) what files have this problem? @Ooligan —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

@Mdaniels5757 I sorry I forgot this link here: File:20220420-OSE-LSC-0008 (52017717961).jpg The Flickr photo not found category has the other 6 related photos/ files. On one of these other files I had added an archived link to the actual flickr photo back in November of 2022. I had forgot about it until I found it (and the others) again today. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 02:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Here is the photo I had added archival link to in November- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A20220420-OSE-LSC-0017_%2852018502835%29.jpg&diff=708439087&oldid=701649580 -- Ooligan (talk) 02:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Here are the others files:

File:20220420-OSE-LSC-0012 (52016945532).jpg

File:20220420-OSE-LSC-0014 (52016945537).jpg

File:20220420-OSE-LSC-0015 (52017981371).jpg

File:20220420-OSE-LSC-0016 (52017981416).jpg

File:20220420-OSE-LSC-0019 (52018502940).jpg

File:20220420-OSE-LSC-0017 (52018502835).jpg Ooligan (talk) 02:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

I don't know the answer to your questions, but I manually reviewed the files. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate your response and manual review of those files. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

it's not a delay. check file history. RZuo (talk) 04:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Position of category added by YiFeiBot

Hi. I've been working on emptying Category:Pages using Information template with parsing errors. One problem I'm regularly encountering is that I can't easily undo edits due to the category being added to the top of the file. Would it be possible to add it to the bottom instead, where categories are usually found? Thanks :) Cryptic-waveform (talk) 21:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

@Cryptic-waveform: It's added to the bottom to mitigate the case where the addition of category in wikitext has no effect. For example, a page like whose contents is

<!--

appending [[category:foo]] to the page results in

<!--
[[category:foo]]

[[category:foo]] remain in the HTML comment and has no effect. This is especially bad because in the case of Category:Pages using Information template with parsing errors, where the bot sees {{informaton in pages added to the category, so the page most likely has some sort of brokenness, and it was decided to just use prepending to simplify the logic rather than attempting an append then changing to prepend if it has no effect.

By the way, you said you can't easily undo. I see you have undone them via HotCat in edits like Special:Diff/743064967. Is some other tool you were using unable to remove the category when they are at the top? In that case I guess it's a tooling issue and it's probably easier to fix that instead? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Also thanks for fixing the pages --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for looking into this. The issue I have is not with Hotcat, it's trying to undo edits that happened before the bot adds the Category:Pages using Information template with parsing errors. Oftentimes the parsing errors are due to just one last bad edit which could easily just be undone. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Looking at this again, I'm actually not even sure that the position of the category is what prevents undoing bad edits. When trying to undo this diff, I see "The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit." The position of the category should not have any effect here. So there is probably nothing to fix or change here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

"Speedy Delete" files

Does a file deleted by the "speedy delete" process have the "contributions" history also deleted? -- Ooligan (talk) 00:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

@Zhuyifei1999 pinging User. No reply since 19 May. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 21:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Blacklistling of known license laundering flickr accounts

Hello! Is there a way to blacklist Flickr accounts? this person is known to upload copyrighted images to Flickr then move over to Commons and the bot checkmarks them, and people have to clean up afterwards.

Is there a public blacklist feature or something similar? Thanks! grin ✎ 10:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

COM:QFI. RZuo (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Category prepended

Hello!

Your bot prepends Category:Media missing infobox template. Shouldn't it be appended instead? Jonteemil (talk) 22:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in/contribute to a photo contest

English

Dear Zhuyifei1999,

We’re excited to share with you our first-ever art and photo contest for this year’s #VisibleWikiWomen, on Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports!

We’re inviting submissions of photos, illustrations, and other forms of art depicting womxn and non-binary people in sports — as athletes, fans, cheerleaders, referees, journalists, and much more. Our #VisibleWikiWomxn contest celebrates the bodies of womxn in sports by centering their voices, images, stories, and experiences in all their diversity, plurality, and glory.

You can find all the information on our landing page: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports

Spanish

Hola Zhuyifei1999,

Queremos invitarte a participar de nuestro primer concurso de arte y fotografía "Cuerpos plurales en el deporte" en el marco de la campaña #VisibleWikiWomen de este año.

Estamos convocando a presentar fotos, ilustraciones y otras formas de arte que representen a mujeres y personas no binarias en el deporte - atletas, personas aficionadas, animadoras, árbitras, periodistas y personas ligadas al deporte en todos los aspectos. Nuestro concurso #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra los cuerpos de las mujeres en el deporte centrándose en sus voces, imágenes, historias y experiencias en toda su diversidad, pluralidad y gloria.

Puedes encontrar toda la información en la página del concurso.

Portuguese

Olá Zhuyifei1999,

Ficamos felizes em convidar você a participar de nossa primeira Wiki-competição de arte e fotografia, como parte da campanha #VisibleWikiWomen deste ano, sobre "Corpos plurais no esporte"!

Estamos recebendo fotos, ilustrações, e outras formas de arte que retratem mulheres e pessoas não-binárias nos esportes — como atletas, torcedoras, juízas, jornalistas, e muito mais. Nossa competição #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra os corpors de mulheres e pessoas não-binárias e coloca ao centro suas vozes, imagens, histórias, e experiências em toda sua pluralidade e glória.

Você pode encontrar todas as informações necessárias em nossa página: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports.

Sunshine Fionah Komusana (talk) 14:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Streamlined way to re-run FlickrreviewR for multiple files?

I noticed that Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review has 80,000+ images and only growing. But for many (though not all), it's simply a matter of changing to an appropriate license and re-running the reviewer bot. Is there a way to make Flickrreview re-run without manually replacing the template for each image? Thanks! Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

@Adeletron 3030 can you plz give an example file of what you mean by "changing to an appropriate license"? RZuo (talk) 11:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Patches waiting for a push

HI, There are at least 2 issues about Video2Commons with patches which are waiting for submitting: [1] and [2]. Could you help please? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Add recognition of {{PDMark-owner}} to FlickrreviewR

Hello, I found that pictures from flickr with this tag are still unable to be automatically reviewed (e.g. File:-i---i- (51870809980).jpg). Could you please add support for this tag, which will greatly reduce the amount of manual review work. Thank you. 0x0a (talk) 08:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

@0x0a: Hi,

IIRC, there is a reason for that. We accept PDMark-owner only if the picture is from the author, and the bot can't check that itself. {{Cc-zero}} is a better license. Yann (talk) 10:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

@Yann To my confusion, the bot can recognize the {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} tag. Should I manually switch to that tag when I confirm that the flickr user is the author? e.g. File:-i---i- (51736890069).jpg. 0x0a (talk) 12:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Bot is not operational (February 16th, 2024)

Hello, the bot seems to be stuck and is not reviewing files. Special:Contributions/FlickreviewR_2 shows last review was "09:09, February 14, 2024" for File:Semana da Música Dois dias depois de ontem 20.11 (2) (52514143306).jpg

Please check, thank you! // sikander { talk } 🦖 15:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

@Zhuyifei1999, This bot is still "stopped" (for over 2 days). Please, see: [3]. Thanks @Sikander, --Ooligan (talk) 23:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

@Ooligan: Cleared the pending files in Category:22ª Semana da Música (Votuporanga) in case the bot had gotten stuck after processing File:Semana da Música Dois dias depois de ontem 20.11 (2) (52514143306).jpg but unfortuantely doesn't seem to have made a difference. // sikander { talk } 🦖 23:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

@Sikander, Thank you for removing a potential bot obstacle. I just checked the bot and it is still not processing yet, but I appreciate that you tried to get it moving again. --Ooligan (talk) 00:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

+1. There are 10,000+ Flickr files waiting for review. Please fix it ASAP. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Follow-up: bot was rebooted by a developer, thank you Stemoc, and it is operational again as of February 18, 2024. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 🦖 15:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)